Right Wing Blogs Ban Truth Tellers

Print the article

This entry was posted on 7/20/2007 8:37 AM and is filed under General Comment.


I have commented on a number of "right wing" blogs, and if I tell it like it is they always ban me. Why can't the right wingers handle the truth? I don't threaten users, and only tell the truth (and can always provide links), and usually stay directly on topic. Why can't they have a discussion with someone that pays attention, and knows when they are being lied to by their leaders?  Are the right wingers so embarrassed about their positions they would rather ban someone than defend themselves, and their ideology?

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
    Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

    • 7/20/2007 11:18 AM Greg wrote:
      It's because they aren't interested in the truth. They'd root for their side if the Republicans nuked Tacoma.
      Reply to this
    • 7/21/2007 9:28 PM FireFox wrote:
      What I think is great is when the "blog police" delete comments they don't like, and their bloggers are answering to people that don't exist, and seeming to be arguing with, and calling names people that can not be located in the thread. If the moderator then deletes all the regulars attacking the ghost, then the regulars will get pissed when their comments are deleted. What a sad, sad, sad game the rightwingnuts must play!
      Reply to this
    • 7/22/2007 1:47 PM John Barelli wrote:
      Well, considering some of what we see over on the almost completely uncensored "horsesass.org" board, I can see two sides to this issue.

      Mr. Sharansky has gotten progressively less tolerant of opposing views. Back when I would occasionally post over there, he was merely rude (regardless of how polite the poster tried to be).

      Now his side is losing badly, and he really has no response to a reasoned liberal post, so he either has to consider that the liberal might have a good point, or simply ban the liberal.

      The first option requires the ability to consider viewpoints other than that espoused by the official Republican Party Platform.

      Since it is apparent that he is unable to do that, he must ban any reasonable liberal.

      Oddly enough, he doesn't seem to mind far left posts, as long as they are not reasoned and intelligent.
      Reply to this
    • 7/23/2007 5:32 PM frodo wrote:
      All facts support my positions,
      Hi, Iv'e read your commentary on Rawstory and now here. You seem to know what you are talking about. I have a little problem, in the online version of my local newspaper there is a comment section to the opinion columns that has been taken over by righties, one of them being very well spoken with lots of so called facts to back him up, I'm rather ordinary, without alot of links and factual back up to my opinions. I was wondering if you and, or any of your factually prepared constitutants would be interested in going over to paradise post.com and putting a little progressive commentary and response to the vigorous Republican debator and his followers?
      Reply to this
    • 7/23/2007 6:24 PM All Facts Support My Positions wrote:
      Frodo, what is the link to the website / blog? I went to paradisepost.com and I can't find a blog there.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.



      

    Copyright . http://soundpolitics.net. All rights reserved.